Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 pro vs Magistral Small

Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro
vs
Mistral AI
Magistral Small

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

Magistral Small

Per Request:$0.001250
Daily:$0.125
Monthly:$3.75
Yearly:$45.625

Cost Differences

$0.10375
Per Request
$10.375
Daily
$311.25
Monthly
$3,786.875
Yearly

Magistral Small costs less than GPT-5.2 pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 proMagistral Small
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$21.00/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Output Price$168.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryreasoningreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date12/11/202512/15/2025

GPT-5.2 pro vs Magistral Small: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 pro and Magistral Small depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Magistral Small is the more affordable option at $0.50/1M input tokens98% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro. Meanwhile, GPT-5.2 pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Magistral Small.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the reasoning category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Magistral Small would save you roughly $31,125.00/month compared to GPT-5.2 pro. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 pro charges $168.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Magistral Small. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Magistral Small has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.2 pro supports vision (image inputs) while Magistral Small is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Magistral Small when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

Magistral Small (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Magistral Small today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 pro or Magistral Small?
Magistral Small is cheaper for input tokens at $0.50 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 98% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 pro and Magistral Small?
GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while Magistral Small supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2 pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Magistral Small is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Magistral Small for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month and Magistral Small costs about $3.75/month. Overall, Magistral Small has lower combined input + output rates ($0.50 in, $1.50 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles