Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 pro vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 4 Maverick

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

Llama 4 Maverick

Per Request:$0.000695
Daily:$0.0695
Monthly:$2.085
Yearly:$25.3675

Cost Differences

$0.104305
Per Request
$10.4305
Daily
$312.915
Monthly
$3,807.1325
Yearly

Llama 4 Maverick costs less than GPT-5.2 pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 proLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderOpenAIMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$21.00/1M tokens$0.27/1M tokens
Output Price$168.00/1M tokens$0.85/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryreasoningflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date12/11/20254/5/2025

GPT-5.2 pro vs Llama 4 Maverick: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 pro and Llama 4 Maverick depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.27/1M input tokens99% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.2 pro is a reasoning model while Llama 4 Maverick is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.2 pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Llama 4 Maverick offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 pro charges $168.00/1M output tokens vs $0.85 for Llama 4 Maverick. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 4 Maverick has the edge here at $0.85/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (audio, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

Llama 4 Maverick (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Llama 4 Maverick today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 pro or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper for input tokens at $0.27 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 pro and Llama 4 Maverick?
GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while Llama 4 Maverick supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2 pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 4 Maverick is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Llama 4 Maverick for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $2.085/month. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick has lower combined input + output rates ($0.27 in, $0.85 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles