Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 pro vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Compare OpenAI and xAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro
vs
xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

Grok 4.1 Fast

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Cost Differences

$0.10455
Per Request
$10.455
Daily
$313.65
Monthly
$3,816.075
Yearly

Grok 4.1 Fast costs less than GPT-5.2 pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 proGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input Price$21.00/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$168.00/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryreasoningefficient
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textreasoningcode
Release Date12/11/20251/15/2026

GPT-5.2 pro vs Grok 4.1 Fast: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.2 pro and Grok 4.1 Fast depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 4.1 Fast is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens99% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro. Meanwhile, Grok 4.1 Fast offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for GPT-5.2 pro.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-5.2 pro is a reasoning model while Grok 4.1 Fast is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.2 pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Grok 4.1 Fast offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.2 pro charges $168.00/1M output tokens vs $0.50 for Grok 4.1 Fast. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 4.1 Fast has the edge here at $0.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-5.2 pro supports vision (image inputs) while Grok 4.1 Fast is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI)

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Grok 4.1 Fast today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 pro or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.2 pro and Grok 4.1 Fast?
GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while Grok 4.1 Fast supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,000,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.1 Fast.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok 4.1 Fast is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.1 Fast offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Grok 4.1 Fast for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.1 Fast for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month and Grok 4.1 Fast costs about $1.35/month. Overall, Grok 4.1 Fast has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.50 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles