Skip to main content

GPT-5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

GPT-5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: GPT-5.1 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.25/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while GPT-5.1 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose GPT-5.1 for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.1 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

OpenAI
GPT-5.1
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.001000
Per Request
$0.10
Daily
$3.00
Monthly
$36.50
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less than GPT-5.1

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.5. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 saves about $3.00/month ($36.50/year) versus GPT-5.1.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input Price$1.25/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output131,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date11/12/20254/29/2026

GPT-5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.5 is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, GPT-5.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Mistral Medium 3.5 would save you roughly $300.00/month compared to GPT-5.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-5.1 charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the edge here at $7.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

GPT-5.1

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than GPT-5.1
  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.1

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $1.25 for GPT-5.1.
What is the context window difference between GPT-5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5?
GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 744,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $7.50 out) vs GPT-5.1.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.