Skip to main content

GPT-4o mini vs o3-mini

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
vs
OpenAI
o3-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4o mini

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

o3-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

+$0.002850
Per Request
+$0.285
Daily
+$8.55
Monthly
+$104.025
Yearly

o3-mini costs more than GPT-4o mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o minio3-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$0.60/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textvision
textreasoningcode
Release Date7/18/20241/31/2025

GPT-4o mini vs o3-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4o mini and o3-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4o mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens86% cheaper than o3-mini. Meanwhile, o3-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 500,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o mini.

These models target different tiers: GPT-4o mini is a efficient model while o3-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3-mini targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-4o mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4o mini charges $0.60/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o3-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4o mini has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-4o mini supports vision (image inputs) while o3-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4o mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose o3-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (500,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI)

o3-mini (OpenAI)

Start using GPT-4o mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using o3-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or o3-mini?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $1.10 for o3-mini — that's 86% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4o mini and o3-mini?
GPT-4o mini supports 128,000 tokens while o3-mini supports 500,000 tokens — a difference of 372,000 tokens in favor of o3-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4o mini is the lower-cost option, while o3-mini offers a larger context window (500,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4o mini for budget sensitivity or o3-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4o mini costs about $1.35/month and o3-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, GPT-4o mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs o3-mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles