Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok Code Fast 1

Compare OpenAI and xAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4.1 nano

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

+$0.000650
Per Request
+$0.065
Daily
+$1.95
Monthly
+$23.725
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs more than GPT-4.1 nano

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 nanoGrok Code Fast 1
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input Price$0.10/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$0.40/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientstandard
Capabilities
text
textcodereasoning
Release Date4/14/20252/1/2026

GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens50% cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: GPT-4.1 nano is a efficient model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok Code Fast 1 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-4.1 nano provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4.1 nano charges $0.40/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using GPT-4.1 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Grok Code Fast 1?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.10 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok Code Fast 1 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4.1 nano and Grok Code Fast 1?
GPT-4.1 nano supports 128,000 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4.1 nano is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4.1 nano for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4.1 nano costs about $0.90/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.10 in, $0.40 out) vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles