GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Compare OpenAI and Mistral AI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
GPT-4.1 mini
Mistral Medium 3.1
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs more than GPT-4.1 mini
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.40/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.60/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max Output | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Category | efficient | balanced |
| Capabilities | textvisioncode | textcodereasoning |
| Release Date | 4/14/2025 | 8/1/2025 |
GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 mini is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, GPT-4.1 mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: GPT-4.1 mini is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.1 targets more demanding workloads, while GPT-4.1 mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. GPT-4.1 mini charges $1.60/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 mini has the edge here at $1.60/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: GPT-4.1 mini supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Medium 3.1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose GPT-4.1 mini when:
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI)
Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)
Start using GPT-4.1 mini today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →