Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-4.1 nano

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

GPT-4.1 mini

Per Request:$0.001200
Daily:$0.12
Monthly:$3.60
Yearly:$43.80

GPT-4.1 nano

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Cost Differences

$0.000900
Per Request
$0.09
Daily
$2.70
Monthly
$32.85
Yearly

GPT-4.1 nano costs less than GPT-4.1 mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 nano
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$0.40/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Output Price$1.60/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens8,192 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncode
text
Release Date4/14/20254/14/2025

GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-4.1 nano: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between GPT-4.1 mini and GPT-4.1 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens75% cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini. Meanwhile, GPT-4.1 mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4.1 nano would save you roughly $270.00/month compared to GPT-4.1 mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. GPT-4.1 mini charges $1.60/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-4.1 mini supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-4.1 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose GPT-4.1 mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI)

GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)

Start using GPT-4.1 mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using GPT-4.1 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or GPT-4.1 nano?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.10 per million tokens vs $0.40 for GPT-4.1 mini — that's 75% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between GPT-4.1 mini and GPT-4.1 nano?
GPT-4.1 mini supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4.1 nano supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of GPT-4.1 mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4.1 nano is the lower-cost option, while GPT-4.1 mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4.1 nano for budget sensitivity or GPT-4.1 mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, GPT-4.1 mini costs about $3.60/month and GPT-4.1 nano costs about $0.90/month. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.10 in, $0.40 out) vs GPT-4.1 mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles