Skip to main content

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Pricing verdict: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5: input pricing is tied at $1.50/M, Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for output-heavy usage ($7.50/M output), and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash is better for long-context tasks (1,048,576 tokens).

Direct answer: input pricing is tied. Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for cheaper output and choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Google
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Per Request:$0.01025
Daily:$1.025
Monthly:$30.75
Yearly:$374.125

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.005000
Per Request
$0.50
Daily
$15.00
Monthly
$182.50
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.5. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 saves about $15.00/month ($182.50/year) versus Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Omni 1.1 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$17.50/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window1,048,576 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output57,920 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideo
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date8/27/20264/29/2026

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models charge $1.50/1M input tokens, but Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper on output at $7.50/1M. Meanwhile, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a significantly larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These models come from different providers — Google and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Mistral Medium 3.5 would save you roughly $1,500.00/month compared to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash charges $17.50/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the edge here at $7.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 57,920 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $17.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Max output: 57,920 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash (Google)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Input pricing is tied at $1.50 per million tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper on output at $7.50 vs $17.50 for Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, so it wins for output-heavy usage.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 792,576 tokens in favor of Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the lower-cost option, while Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash offers a larger context window (1,048,576 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for budget sensitivity or Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash costs about $30.75/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $7.50 out) vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash.
Where can I compare Google and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.