Skip to main content

Gemini Embedding 2 vs o3-pro

Compare Google and OpenAI AI models

Google
Gemini Embedding 2
vs
OpenAI
o3-pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Embedding 2

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

o3-pro

Per Request:$0.06
Daily:$6.00
Monthly:$180.00
Yearly:$2,190.00

Cost Differences

+$0.0597
Per Request
+$5.97
Daily
+$179.10
Monthly
+$2,179.05
Yearly

o3-pro costs more than Gemini Embedding 2

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Embedding 2o3-pro
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$20.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.20/1M tokens$80.00/1M tokens
Context Window8,192 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output3,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryembeddingreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoembeddings
textreasoningcode
Release Date3/10/20266/10/2025

Gemini Embedding 2 vs o3-pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Embedding 2 and o3-pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini Embedding 2 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens99% cheaper than o3-pro. Meanwhile, o3-pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 8,192 for Gemini Embedding 2.

These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini Embedding 2 is a embedding model while o3-pro is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3-pro targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini Embedding 2 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Embedding 2 charges $0.20/1M output tokens vs $80.00 for o3-pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini Embedding 2 has the edge here at $0.20/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Embedding 2 supports vision (image inputs) while o3-pro is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Embedding 2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, embeddings)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose o3-pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Embedding 2 (Google)

o3-pro (OpenAI)

Start using Gemini Embedding 2 today

Sign Up for Google

Start using o3-pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Embedding 2 or o3-pro?
Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $20.00 for o3-pro — that's 99% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Embedding 2 and o3-pro?
Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8,192 tokens while o3-pro supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 991,808 tokens in favor of o3-pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini Embedding 2 is the lower-cost option, while o3-pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 8,192 tokens). Choose Gemini Embedding 2 for budget sensitivity or o3-pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Embedding 2 costs about $0.90/month and o3-pro costs about $180.00/month. Overall, Gemini Embedding 2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.20 out) vs o3-pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles