Skip to main content

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Grok Code Fast 1

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Grok Code Fast 1: Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.20/M vs $0.20/M input tokens), while Grok Code Fast 1 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini Embedding 2 for lower token spend and choose Grok Code Fast 1 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Google
Gemini Embedding 2
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini Embedding 2

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

+$0.000650
Per Request
+$0.065
Daily
+$1.95
Monthly
+$23.725
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs more than Gemini Embedding 2

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini Embedding 2. At the default workload, Gemini Embedding 2 saves about $1.95/month ($23.725/year) versus Grok Code Fast 1.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini Embedding 2Grok Code Fast 1
ProviderGooglexAI
Input Price$0.20/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$0.20/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window8,192 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output3,072 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryembeddingstandard
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoembeddings
textcodereasoning
Release Date3/10/20262/1/2026

Gemini Embedding 2 vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini Embedding 2 and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini Embedding 2 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 8,192 for Gemini Embedding 2.

These models come from different providers — Google and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini Embedding 2 is a embedding model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok Code Fast 1 targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini Embedding 2 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini Embedding 2 charges $0.20/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini Embedding 2 has the edge here at $0.20/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Embedding 2 supports vision (image inputs) while Grok Code Fast 1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini Embedding 2 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, embeddings)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini Embedding 2

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Context window: 8,192 tokens
  • Max output: 3,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Grok Code Fast 1

Grok Code Fast 1

  • Input pricing: $0.20/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Gemini Embedding 2

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini Embedding 2 (Google)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using Gemini Embedding 2 today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini Embedding 2 or Grok Code Fast 1?
Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok Code Fast 1.
What is the context window difference between Gemini Embedding 2 and Grok Code Fast 1?
Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8,192 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 247,808 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini Embedding 2 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 8,192 tokens). Choose Gemini Embedding 2 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini Embedding 2 costs about $0.90/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, Gemini Embedding 2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.20 out) vs Grok Code Fast 1.
Where can I compare Google and xAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs xAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.