Skip to main content

Gemini 3.8 Live vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Pricing verdict: Gemini 3.8 Live vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.75/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.8 Live for lower token spend and choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Live
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.8 Live

Per Request:$0.003000
Daily:$0.30
Monthly:$9.00
Yearly:$109.50

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

+$0.002250
Per Request
+$0.225
Daily
+$6.75
Monthly
+$82.125
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Gemini 3.8 Live

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini 3.8 Live. At the default workload, Gemini 3.8 Live saves about $6.75/month ($82.125/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.8 LiveMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Input Price$0.75/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$4.50/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window131,072 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideoreasoningstreaming
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date9/15/20264/29/2026

Gemini 3.8 Live vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.8 Live and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.8 Live is the more affordable option at $0.75/1M input tokens — 50% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Gemini 3.8 Live.

These models come from different providers — Google and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.8 Live is a balanced model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.5 targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini 3.8 Live provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.8 Live charges $4.50/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.8 Live has the edge here at $4.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.8 Live when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (audio, video, streaming)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 3.8 Live

  • Input pricing: $0.75/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.8 Live
  • Higher output cost than Gemini 3.8 Live

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.8 Live (Google)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Gemini 3.8 Live today

Sign Up for Google

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Live or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input tokens at $0.75 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5 — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.8 Live and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.8 Live supports 131,072 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 124,928 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini 3.8 Live is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.8 Live for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.8 Live costs about $9.00/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Gemini 3.8 Live has lower combined input + output rates ($0.75 in, $4.50 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.5.
Where can I compare Google and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.