Gemini 3.5 Flash vs o3
Pricing verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs o3: Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $2.00/M input tokens), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for lower token spend and choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when your workload needs longer context.
Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Gemini 3.5 Flash
o3
Cost Differences
Both models cost the same at the default workload.
Quick Recommendation
Direct API pricing is a tie at the default workload: both land around $18.00/month. Choose the model that better fits your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gemini 3.5 Flash | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $2.00/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $9.00/1M tokens | $8.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Category | flagship | reasoning |
| Capabilities | textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning | textreasoningvisioncode |
| Release Date | 5/19/2026 | 4/16/2025 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs o3: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Gemini 3.5 Flash and o3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens — 25% cheaper than o3.
These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.5 Flash is a flagship model while o3 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini 3.5 Flash is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o3 offers better value for routine operations.
Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.5 Flash charges $9.00/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3 has the edge here at $8.00/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.
Best Use Cases
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need more capabilities (audio, video)
- • You're already using Google's API ecosystem
Choose o3 when:
- • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $9.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
- • Max output: 65,536 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher output cost than o3
o3
- • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $8.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
- • Max output: 131,072 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.5 Flash
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Gemini 3.5 Flash (Google)
o3 (OpenAI)
Start using Gemini 3.5 Flash today
Sign Up for Google →Start using o3 today
Sign Up for OpenAI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or o3?▼
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.5 Flash and o3?▼
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Where can I compare Google and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.