Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5: Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($2.00/M vs $5.00/M input tokens), while GPT-5.5 is better for long-context tasks (1,050,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for lower token spend and choose GPT-5.5 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5 • Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5 pricing • Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5 API pricing and 3 1 pro vs 5 5 pricing.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Per Request:$0.008000
Daily:$0.80
Monthly:$24.00
Yearly:$292.00

GPT-5.5

Per Request:$0.02
Daily:$2.00
Monthly:$60.00
Yearly:$730.00

Cost Differences

+$0.012
Per Request
+$1.20
Daily
+$36.00
Monthly
+$438.00
Yearly

GPT-5.5 costs more than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini 3.1 Pro. At the default workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro saves about $36.00/month ($438.00/year) versus GPT-5.5.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.5
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$5.00/1M tokens
Output Price$12.00/1M tokens$30.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens128,000 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date2/19/20264/24/2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens60% cheaper than GPT-5.5. Meanwhile, GPT-5.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Gemini 3.1 Pro would save you roughly $3,600.00/month compared to GPT-5.5. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $12.00/1M output tokens vs $30.00 for GPT-5.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge here at $12.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (audio, video)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.5 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $12.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5

  • Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $30.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • Higher output cost than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)

GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)

Start using Gemini 3.1 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Start using GPT-5.5 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $5.00 for GPT-5.5 — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while GPT-5.5 supports 1,050,000 tokens — a difference of 50,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.5.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.5 offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs about $24.00/month and GPT-5.5 costs about $60.00/month. Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $12.00 out) vs GPT-5.5.
Where can I compare Google and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Google vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.