Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Compare Google and OpenAI AI models

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Per Request:$0.008000
Daily:$0.80
Monthly:$24.00
Yearly:$292.00

GPT-5.3 Codex

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Cost Differences

+$0.000750
Per Request
+$0.075
Daily
+$2.25
Monthly
+$27.375
Yearly

GPT-5.3 Codex costs more than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.3 Codex
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output Price$12.00/1M tokens$14.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipcoding
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
textcode
Release Date2/19/20263/1/2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.3 Codex: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.3 Codex depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 256,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex.

These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.1 Pro is a flagship model while GPT-5.3 Codex is coding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini 3.1 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while GPT-5.3 Codex offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $12.00/1M output tokens vs $14.00 for GPT-5.3 Codex. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge here at $12.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-5.3 Codex is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI)

Start using Gemini 3.1 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Start using GPT-5.3 Codex today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.3 Codex?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.3 Codex?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while GPT-5.3 Codex supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 744,000 tokens in favor of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 256,000 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for budget sensitivity or Gemini 3.1 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs about $24.00/month and GPT-5.3 Codex costs about $26.25/month. Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $12.00 out) vs GPT-5.3 Codex.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles