Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.2

Compare Google and OpenAI AI models

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Per Request:$0.008000
Daily:$0.80
Monthly:$24.00
Yearly:$292.00

GPT-5.2

Per Request:$0.008750
Daily:$0.875
Monthly:$26.25
Yearly:$319.375

Cost Differences

+$0.000750
Per Request
+$0.075
Daily
+$2.25
Monthly
+$27.375
Yearly

GPT-5.2 costs more than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.2
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input Price$2.00/1M tokens$1.75/1M tokens
Output Price$12.00/1M tokens$14.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date2/19/202612/11/2025

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens.

These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Gemini 3.1 Pro would save you roughly $225.00/month compared to GPT-5.2. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $12.00/1M output tokens vs $14.00 for GPT-5.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge here at $12.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (video)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)

GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

Start using Gemini 3.1 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Start using GPT-5.2 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $1.75 for GPT-5.2.
What is the context window difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while GPT-5.2 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the lower-cost option, while Gemini 3.1 Pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for budget sensitivity or Gemini 3.1 Pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs about $24.00/month and GPT-5.2 costs about $26.25/month. Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $12.00 out) vs GPT-5.2.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles