Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview vs GPT-5.2
Compare Google and OpenAI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview
GPT-5.2
Cost Differences
GPT-5.2 costs more than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input Price | $0.25/1M tokens | $1.75/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $1.50/1M tokens | $14.00/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Category | efficient | flagship |
| Capabilities | textvisioncode | textvisionaudiocodereasoning |
| Release Date | 3/3/2026 | 12/11/2025 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview vs GPT-5.2: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview and GPT-5.2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview is the more affordable option at $0.25/1M input tokens — 86% cheaper than GPT-5.2.
These models come from different providers — Google and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Google, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview is a efficient model while GPT-5.2 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.2 targets more demanding workloads, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview charges $1.50/1M output tokens vs $14.00 for GPT-5.2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.
Best Use Cases
Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using Google's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose GPT-5.2 when:
- • You need more capabilities (audio, reasoning)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (Google)
GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)
Start using Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview today
Sign Up for Google →Start using GPT-5.2 today
Sign Up for OpenAI →