Devstral 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Devstral 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Devstral 2 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.40/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Devstral 2 is better for long-context tasks (262,144 tokens).
Direct answer: choose Devstral 2 for lower token spend and choose Devstral 2 when your workload needs longer context.
Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Devstral 2
Mistral Medium 3.5
Cost Differences
Mistral Medium 3.5 costs more than Devstral 2
Quick Recommendation
Winner for direct API pricing: Devstral 2. At the default workload, Devstral 2 saves about $11.55/month ($140.525/year) versus Mistral Medium 3.5.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Devstral 2 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Input Price | $0.40/1M tokens | $1.50/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $2.00/1M tokens | $7.50/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 262,144 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Category | efficient | flagship |
| Capabilities | textcode | textvisioncodereasoning |
| Release Date | 12/9/2025 | 4/29/2026 |
Devstral 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Devstral 2 and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Devstral 2 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens — 73% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5. Meanwhile, Devstral 2 offers a significantly larger context window at 262,144 tokens vs 256,000 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
These models target different tiers: Devstral 2 is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3.5 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.5 targets more demanding workloads, while Devstral 2 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Devstral 2 charges $2.00/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Devstral 2 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Devstral 2 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Devstral 2 when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You need a larger context window (262,144 tokens)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:
- • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
- • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem
Pros and Caveats at a Glance
Devstral 2
- • Input pricing: $0.40/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $2.00/M tokens
- • Context window: 262,144 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.
Mistral Medium 3.5
- • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
- • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
- • Context window: 256,000 tokens
- • Max output: 32,768 tokens
Watch out for
- • Higher input cost than Devstral 2
- • Higher output cost than Devstral 2
- • Smaller context window than Devstral 2
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Devstral 2 (Mistral AI)
Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)
Start using Devstral 2 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today
Sign Up for Mistral AI →Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 or Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
What is the context window difference between Devstral 2 and Mistral Medium 3.5?▼
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼
Related Comparisons
Related Articles
Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.