Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3

Pricing verdict: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3: DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.66/M vs $1.25/M input tokens), while Muse Spark 1.3 is better for long-context tasks (1,048,576 tokens).

Direct answer: choose DeepSeek V4 Pro for lower token spend and choose Muse Spark 1.3 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Pro
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Muse Spark 1.3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Per Request:$0.001650
Daily:$0.165
Monthly:$4.95
Yearly:$60.225

Muse Spark 1.3

Per Request:$0.003375
Daily:$0.3375
Monthly:$10.125
Yearly:$123.1875

Cost Differences

+$0.001725
Per Request
+$0.1725
Daily
+$5.175
Monthly
+$62.9625
Yearly

Muse Spark 1.3 costs more than DeepSeek V4 Pro

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: DeepSeek V4 Pro. At the default workload, DeepSeek V4 Pro saves about $5.175/month ($62.9625/year) versus Muse Spark 1.3.

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V4 ProMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderDeepSeekMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$0.66/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$1.98/1M tokens$4.25/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max Output384,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipcoding
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
Release Date4/24/20269/2/2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. DeepSeek V4 Pro is the more affordable option at $0.66/1M input tokens — 47% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3. Meanwhile, Muse Spark 1.3 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens vs 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro.

These models come from different providers — DeepSeek and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with DeepSeek, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: DeepSeek V4 Pro is a flagship model while Muse Spark 1.3 is coding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. DeepSeek V4 Pro is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Muse Spark 1.3 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. DeepSeek V4 Pro charges $1.98/1M output tokens vs $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge here at $1.98/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Muse Spark 1.3 supports vision (image inputs) while DeepSeek V4 Pro is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 384,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using DeepSeek's API ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

DeepSeek V4 Pro

  • Input pricing: $0.66/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $1.98/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 384,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3

  • Input pricing: $1.25/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.25/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,048,576 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than DeepSeek V4 Pro
  • Higher output cost than DeepSeek V4 Pro

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)

Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using DeepSeek V4 Pro today

Sign Up for DeepSeek

Start using Muse Spark 1.3 today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper for input tokens at $0.66 per million tokens vs $1.25 for Muse Spark 1.3 — that's 47% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3?
DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens while Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1,048,576 tokens — a difference of 48,576 tokens in favor of Muse Spark 1.3.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, DeepSeek V4 Pro is the lower-cost option, while Muse Spark 1.3 offers a larger context window (1,048,576 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro for budget sensitivity or Muse Spark 1.3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, DeepSeek V4 Pro costs about $4.95/month and Muse Spark 1.3 costs about $10.125/month. Overall, DeepSeek V4 Pro has lower combined input + output rates ($0.66 in, $1.98 out) vs Muse Spark 1.3.
Where can I compare DeepSeek and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the DeepSeek vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.