Skip to main content

Command R vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare Cohere and Mistral AI AI models

Cohere
Command R
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Command R

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

+$0.000950
Per Request
+$0.095
Daily
+$2.85
Monthly
+$34.675
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs more than Command R

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand RMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Input Price$0.15/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$0.60/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientbalanced
Capabilities
textcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date3/11/20248/1/2025

Command R vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Command R and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Command R is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens63% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Command R.

These models come from different providers — Cohere and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Cohere, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Command R is a efficient model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Mistral Medium 3.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Command R provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Command R charges $0.60/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Command R has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Command R when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Cohere's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Command R (Cohere)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Command R today

Sign Up for Cohere

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command R is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $0.40 for Mistral Medium 3.1 — that's 63% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Command R and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command R supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Command R is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Command R for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Command R costs about $1.35/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Command R has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles