Skip to main content

Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.50/M vs $2.50/M input tokens), while Mistral Medium 3.5 is better for long-context tasks (256,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for lower token spend and choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Cohere
Command R+
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Command R+

Per Request:$0.007500
Daily:$0.75
Monthly:$22.50
Yearly:$273.75

Mistral Medium 3.5

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.002250
Per Request
$0.225
Daily
$6.75
Monthly
$82.125
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less than Command R+

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.5. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.5 saves about $6.75/month ($82.125/year) versus Command R+.

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R+Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Input Price$2.50/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$7.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date4/4/20244/29/2026

Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.5 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.5 is the more affordable option at $1.50/1M input tokens40% cheaper than Command R+. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Command R+.

These models come from different providers — Cohere and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Cohere, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Mistral Medium 3.5 would save you roughly $675.00/month compared to Command R+. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Command R+ charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the edge here at $7.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Command R+ is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Command R+ when:

  • • You're already using Cohere's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Command R+

  • Input pricing: $2.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 4,096 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Mistral Medium 3.5
  • Higher output cost than Mistral Medium 3.5
  • Smaller context window than Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $7.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 256,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Command R+ (Cohere)

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI)

Start using Command R+ today

Sign Up for Cohere

Start using Mistral Medium 3.5 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.50 per million tokens vs $2.50 for Command R+ — that's 40% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.5?
Command R+ supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.5.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.5 is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.5 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Command R+ costs about $22.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.5 costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.50 in, $7.50 out) vs Command R+.
Where can I compare Cohere and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Cohere vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.