Skip to main content

Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare Cohere and Mistral AI AI models

Cohere
Command R+
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Command R+

Per Request:$0.007500
Daily:$0.75
Monthly:$22.50
Yearly:$273.75

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.006100
Per Request
$0.61
Daily
$18.30
Monthly
$222.65
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Command R+

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R+Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Input Price$2.50/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryflagshipbalanced
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date4/4/20248/1/2025

Command R+ vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens84% cheaper than Command R+. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Command R+.

These models come from different providers — Cohere and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Cohere, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Command R+ is a flagship model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Command R+ is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Command R+ charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Command R+ when:

  • • You're already using Cohere's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 16,384 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Command R+ (Cohere)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Command R+ today

Sign Up for Cohere

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $2.50 for Command R+ — that's 84% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Command R+ and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command R+ supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Command R+ costs about $22.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs Command R+.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles