Skip to main content

Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1

Compare Cohere and xAI AI models

Cohere
Command R+
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Command R+

Per Request:$0.007500
Daily:$0.75
Monthly:$22.50
Yearly:$273.75

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

$0.006550
Per Request
$0.655
Daily
$19.65
Monthly
$239.075
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs less than Command R+

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R+Grok Code Fast 1
ProviderCoherexAI
Input Price$2.50/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$10.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipstandard
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date4/4/20242/1/2026

Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok Code Fast 1 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens92% cheaper than Command R+. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Command R+.

These models come from different providers — Cohere and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Cohere, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Command R+ is a flagship model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Command R+ is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Command R+ charges $10.00/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge here at $1.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Command R+ when:

  • • You're already using Cohere's API ecosystem

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Command R+ (Cohere)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using Command R+ today

Sign Up for Cohere

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok Code Fast 1?
Grok Code Fast 1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $2.50 for Command R+ — that's 92% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1?
Command R+ supports 128,000 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Grok Code Fast 1 is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Command R+ costs about $22.50/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $1.50 out) vs Command R+.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles