Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs GPT-4o mini

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

GPT-4o mini

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Cost Differences

$0.004050
Per Request
$0.405
Daily
$12.15
Monthly
$147.825
Yearly

GPT-4o mini costs less than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniGPT-4o mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvision
Release Date2/2/20267/18/2024

Codex Mini vs GPT-4o mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and GPT-4o mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4o mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens90% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o mini.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4o mini would save you roughly $1,215.00/month compared to Codex Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $0.60 for GPT-4o mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4o mini has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: GPT-4o mini supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4o mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using GPT-4o mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or GPT-4o mini?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 90% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and GPT-4o mini?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4o mini supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4o mini is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4o mini for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and GPT-4o mini costs about $1.35/month. Overall, GPT-4o mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles