Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs GPT-4.1 nano

Compare OpenAI and OpenAI AI models

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

GPT-4.1 nano

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Cost Differences

$0.004200
Per Request
$0.42
Daily
$12.60
Monthly
$153.30
Yearly

GPT-4.1 nano costs less than Codex Mini

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniGPT-4.1 nano
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.10/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
text
Release Date2/2/20264/14/2025

Codex Mini vs GPT-4.1 nano: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and GPT-4.1 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens93% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4.1 nano would save you roughly $1,260.00/month compared to Codex Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using GPT-4.1 nano today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or GPT-4.1 nano?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper for input tokens at $0.10 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 93% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and GPT-4.1 nano?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4.1 nano supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4.1 nano is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4.1 nano for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and GPT-4.1 nano costs about $0.90/month. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano has lower combined input + output rates ($0.10 in, $0.40 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles