Skip to main content

Codex Mini vs Gemini 3.8 Live

Pricing verdict: Codex Mini vs Gemini 3.8 Live: Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.75/M vs $1.50/M input tokens), while Codex Mini is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.8 Live for lower token spend and choose Codex Mini when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

OpenAI
Codex Mini
vs
Google
Gemini 3.8 Live

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Gemini 3.8 Live

Per Request:$0.003000
Daily:$0.30
Monthly:$9.00
Yearly:$109.50

Cost Differences

$0.001500
Per Request
$0.15
Daily
$4.50
Monthly
$54.75
Yearly

Gemini 3.8 Live costs less than Codex Mini

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini 3.8 Live. At the default workload, Gemini 3.8 Live saves about $4.50/month ($54.75/year) versus Codex Mini.

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniGemini 3.8 Live
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Input Price$1.50/1M tokens$0.75/1M tokens
Output Price$6.00/1M tokens$4.50/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryefficientbalanced
Capabilities
textcodereasoning
textvisionaudiovideoreasoningstreaming
Release Date2/2/20269/15/2026

Codex Mini vs Gemini 3.8 Live: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codex Mini and Gemini 3.8 Live depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.8 Live is the more affordable option at $0.75/1M input tokens — 50% cheaper than Codex Mini. Meanwhile, Codex Mini offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Gemini 3.8 Live.

These models come from different providers — OpenAI and Google — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with OpenAI, switching to Googleinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codex Mini is a efficient model while Gemini 3.8 Live is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini 3.8 Live targets more demanding workloads, while Codex Mini provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codex Mini charges $6.00/1M output tokens vs $4.50 for Gemini 3.8 Live. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.8 Live has the edge here at $4.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini 3.8 Live supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Gemini 3.8 Live when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, streaming)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Codex Mini

  • Input pricing: $1.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $6.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.8 Live
  • Higher output cost than Gemini 3.8 Live

Gemini 3.8 Live

  • Input pricing: $0.75/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Codex Mini

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Gemini 3.8 Live (Google)

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Start using Gemini 3.8 Live today

Sign Up for Google

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codex Mini or Gemini 3.8 Live?
Gemini 3.8 Live is cheaper for input tokens at $0.75 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 50% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codex Mini and Gemini 3.8 Live?
Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens while Gemini 3.8 Live supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 68,928 tokens in favor of Codex Mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini 3.8 Live is the lower-cost option, while Codex Mini offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.8 Live for budget sensitivity or Codex Mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month and Gemini 3.8 Live costs about $9.00/month. Overall, Gemini 3.8 Live has lower combined input + output rates ($0.75 in, $4.50 out) vs Codex Mini.
Where can I compare OpenAI and Google API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the OpenAI vs Google provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.