Skip to main content

Codestral vs o3

Compare Mistral AI and OpenAI AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
OpenAI
o3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

o3

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

+$0.005250
Per Request
+$0.525
Daily
+$15.75
Monthly
+$191.625
Yearly

o3 costs more than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralo3
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textcode
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date7/30/20254/16/2025

Codestral vs o3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and o3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codestral is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens85% cheaper than o3. Meanwhile, o3 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codestral is a balanced model while o3 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 targets more demanding workloads, while Codestral provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codestral has the edge here at $0.90/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: o3 supports vision (image inputs) while Codestral is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose o3 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning, vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

o3 (OpenAI)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using o3 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or o3?
Codestral is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $2.00 for o3 — that's 85% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and o3?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while o3 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 872,000 tokens in favor of o3.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codestral is the lower-cost option, while o3 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Codestral for budget sensitivity or o3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and o3 costs about $18.00/month. Overall, Codestral has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.90 out) vs o3.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles