Skip to main content

Codestral vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare Mistral AI and Mistral AI AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

+$0.000650
Per Request
+$0.065
Daily
+$1.95
Monthly
+$23.725
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs more than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Categorybalancedbalanced
Capabilities
textcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date7/30/20258/1/2025

Codestral vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codestral is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens25% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1. Meanwhile, Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 131,072 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

Both models are in the balanced category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Codestral would save you roughly $195.00/month compared to Mistral Medium 3.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codestral has the edge here at $0.90/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (131,072 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Codestral is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $0.40 for Mistral Medium 3.1 — that's 25% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 3,072 tokens in favor of Mistral Medium 3.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codestral is the lower-cost option, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers a larger context window (131,072 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Codestral for budget sensitivity or Mistral Medium 3.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Codestral has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.90 out) vs Mistral Medium 3.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles