Skip to main content

Codestral vs Grok Code Fast 1

Compare Mistral AI and xAI AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Grok Code Fast 1

Per Request:$0.000950
Daily:$0.095
Monthly:$2.85
Yearly:$34.675

Cost Differences

+$0.000200
Per Request
+$0.02
Daily
+$0.60
Monthly
+$7.30
Yearly

Grok Code Fast 1 costs more than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralGrok Code Fast 1
ProviderMistral AIxAI
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Categorybalancedstandard
Capabilities
textcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date7/30/20252/1/2026

Codestral vs Grok Code Fast 1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and Grok Code Fast 1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codestral is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, Grok Code Fast 1 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codestral is a balanced model while Grok Code Fast 1 is standard. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok Code Fast 1 targets more demanding workloads, while Codestral provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $1.50 for Grok Code Fast 1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codestral has the edge here at $0.90/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Grok Code Fast 1 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Grok Code Fast 1?
Codestral is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $0.20 for Grok Code Fast 1.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and Grok Code Fast 1?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok Code Fast 1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codestral is the lower-cost option, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Codestral for budget sensitivity or Grok Code Fast 1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and Grok Code Fast 1 costs about $2.85/month. Overall, Codestral has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.90 out) vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles