Skip to main content

Codestral vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Compare Mistral AI and xAI AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
xAI
Grok 4.1 Fast

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Grok 4.1 Fast

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Cost Differences

$0.000300
Per Request
$0.03
Daily
$0.90
Monthly
$10.95
Yearly

Grok 4.1 Fast costs less than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderMistral AIxAI
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$0.50/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedefficient
Capabilities
textcode
textreasoningcode
Release Date7/30/20251/15/2026

Codestral vs Grok 4.1 Fast: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and Grok 4.1 Fast depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Grok 4.1 Fast is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Codestral. Meanwhile, Grok 4.1 Fast offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codestral is a balanced model while Grok 4.1 Fast is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4.1 Fast targets more demanding workloads, while Codestral provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $0.50 for Grok 4.1 Fast. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Grok 4.1 Fast has the edge here at $0.50/1M output tokens.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Grok 4.1 Fast today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.30 for Codestral — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and Grok 4.1 Fast?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while Grok 4.1 Fast supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,872,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.1 Fast.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Grok 4.1 Fast is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4.1 Fast offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Grok 4.1 Fast for budget sensitivity or Grok 4.1 Fast for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and Grok 4.1 Fast costs about $1.35/month. Overall, Grok 4.1 Fast has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.50 out) vs Codestral.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles