Skip to main content

Codestral vs Grok 4

Compare Mistral AI and xAI AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
xAI
Grok 4

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Grok 4

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

Cost Differences

+$0.009750
Per Request
+$0.975
Daily
+$29.25
Monthly
+$355.875
Yearly

Grok 4 costs more than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralGrok 4
ProviderMistral AIxAI
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$3.00/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens256,000 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textcode
textvisionreasoningcode
Release Date7/30/20257/9/2025

Codestral vs Grok 4: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and Grok 4 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Codestral is the more affordable option at $0.30/1M input tokens90% cheaper than Grok 4. Meanwhile, Grok 4 offers a significantly larger context window at 256,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Codestral.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and xAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to xAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codestral is a balanced model while Grok 4 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Grok 4 targets more demanding workloads, while Codestral provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $15.00 for Grok 4. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Codestral has the edge here at $0.90/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Grok 4 supports vision (image inputs) while Codestral is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Grok 4 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (256,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using xAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Grok 4 (xAI)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Grok 4 today

Sign Up for xAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Grok 4?
Codestral is cheaper for input tokens at $0.30 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Grok 4 — that's 90% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and Grok 4?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while Grok 4 supports 256,000 tokens — a difference of 128,000 tokens in favor of Grok 4.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Codestral is the lower-cost option, while Grok 4 offers a larger context window (256,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Codestral for budget sensitivity or Grok 4 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and Grok 4 costs about $31.50/month. Overall, Codestral has lower combined input + output rates ($0.30 in, $0.90 out) vs Grok 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles