Skip to main content

Codestral vs Gemini Embedding 2

Compare Mistral AI and Google AI models

Mistral AI
Codestral
vs
Google
Gemini Embedding 2

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Codestral

Per Request:$0.000750
Daily:$0.075
Monthly:$2.25
Yearly:$27.375

Gemini Embedding 2

Per Request:$0.000300
Daily:$0.03
Monthly:$0.90
Yearly:$10.95

Cost Differences

$0.000450
Per Request
$0.045
Daily
$1.35
Monthly
$16.425
Yearly

Gemini Embedding 2 costs less than Codestral

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestralGemini Embedding 2
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Input Price$0.30/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Output Price$0.90/1M tokens$0.20/1M tokens
Context Window128,000 tokens8,192 tokens
Max Output32,768 tokens3,072 tokens
Categorybalancedembedding
Capabilities
textcode
textvisionaudiovideoembeddings
Release Date7/30/20253/10/2026

Codestral vs Gemini Embedding 2: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Codestral and Gemini Embedding 2 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini Embedding 2 is the more affordable option at $0.20/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Codestral. Meanwhile, Codestral offers a significantly larger context window at 128,000 tokens vs 8,192 for Gemini Embedding 2.

These models come from different providers — Mistral AI and Google — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Mistral AI, switching to Googleinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Codestral is a balanced model while Gemini Embedding 2 is embedding. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Gemini Embedding 2 targets more demanding workloads, while Codestral provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Codestral charges $0.90/1M output tokens vs $0.20 for Gemini Embedding 2. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini Embedding 2 has the edge here at $0.20/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Gemini Embedding 2 supports vision (image inputs) while Codestral is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Codestral when:

  • • You need a larger context window (128,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Choose Gemini Embedding 2 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, audio, video, embeddings)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Codestral (Mistral AI)

Gemini Embedding 2 (Google)

Start using Codestral today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Start using Gemini Embedding 2 today

Sign Up for Google

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Gemini Embedding 2?
Gemini Embedding 2 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per million tokens vs $0.30 for Codestral — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Codestral and Gemini Embedding 2?
Codestral supports 128,000 tokens while Gemini Embedding 2 supports 8,192 tokens — a difference of 119,808 tokens in favor of Codestral.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Gemini Embedding 2 is the lower-cost option, while Codestral offers a larger context window (128,000 vs 8,192 tokens). Choose Gemini Embedding 2 for budget sensitivity or Codestral for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Codestral costs about $2.25/month and Gemini Embedding 2 costs about $0.90/month. Overall, Gemini Embedding 2 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.20 in, $0.20 out) vs Codestral.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles