Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-4.1 nano
Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models
Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)
Claude Sonnet 4
GPT-4.1 nano
Cost Differences
GPT-4.1 nano costs less than Claude Sonnet 4
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude Sonnet 4 | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input Price | $3.00/1M tokens | $0.10/1M tokens |
| Output Price | $15.00/1M tokens | $0.40/1M tokens |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max Output | 64,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Category | standard | efficient |
| Capabilities | textvisioncodereasoning | text |
| Release Date | 5/14/2025 | 4/14/2025 |
Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-4.1 nano: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4.1 nano depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4.1 nano is the more affordable option at $0.10/1M input tokens — 97% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4. Meanwhile, Claude Sonnet 4 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4.1 nano.
These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.
These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4 is a standard model while GPT-4.1 nano is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-4.1 nano targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.
Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4.1 nano has the edge here at $0.40/1M output tokens.
Multimodal capabilities: Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision (image inputs) while GPT-4.1 nano is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.
Best Use Cases
Choose Claude Sonnet 4 when:
- • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
- • You need more capabilities (vision, code, reasoning)
- • You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
- • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
Choose GPT-4.1 nano when:
- • Budget is a primary concern
- • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
- • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads
Try Different Scenarios
Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns
Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic)
GPT-4.1 nano (OpenAI)
Start using Claude Sonnet 4 today
Sign Up for Anthropic →Start using GPT-4.1 nano today
Sign Up for OpenAI →