Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

GPT-5.1

Per Request:$0.006250
Daily:$0.625
Monthly:$18.75
Yearly:$228.125

Cost Differences

$0.004250
Per Request
$0.425
Daily
$12.75
Monthly
$155.125
Yearly

GPT-5.1 costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$1.25/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoningcomputer-use
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date2/18/202611/12/2025

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.1 is the more affordable option at $1.25/1M input tokens58% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is a balanced model while GPT-5.1 is flagship. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.1 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $10.00 for GPT-5.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.1 has the edge here at $10.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic)

GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.6 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.25 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 — that's 58% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.1?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000,000 tokens while GPT-5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, GPT-5.1 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.1 for budget sensitivity or Claude Sonnet 4.6 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs about $31.50/month and GPT-5.1 costs about $18.75/month. Overall, GPT-5.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.25 in, $10.00 out) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles