Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
vs
OpenAI
o3

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

o3

Per Request:$0.006000
Daily:$0.60
Monthly:$18.00
Yearly:$219.00

Cost Differences

$0.004500
Per Request
$0.45
Daily
$13.50
Monthly
$164.25
Yearly

o3 costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5o3
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$8.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categorybalancedreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textreasoningvisioncode
Release Date9/29/20254/16/2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o3 is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Meanwhile, o3 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a balanced model while o3 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o3 targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $8.00 for o3. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o3 has the edge here at $8.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o3 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

o3 (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o3 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o3?
o3 is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while o3 supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of o3.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o3 is the lower-cost option, while o3 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o3 for budget sensitivity or o3 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.50/month and o3 costs about $18.00/month. Overall, o3 has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $8.00 out) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles