Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Per Request:$0.0105
Daily:$1.05
Monthly:$31.50
Yearly:$383.25

GPT-5.4 mini

Per Request:$0.003000
Daily:$0.30
Monthly:$9.00
Yearly:$109.50

Cost Differences

$0.007500
Per Request
$0.75
Daily
$22.50
Monthly
$273.75
Yearly

GPT-5.4 mini costs less than Claude Sonnet 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.4 mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$3.00/1M tokens$0.75/1M tokens
Output Price$15.00/1M tokens$4.50/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Categorybalancedefficient
Capabilities
textvisioncode
textvisioncode
Release Date9/29/20253/6/2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.4 mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-5.4 mini is the more affordable option at $0.75/1M input tokens75% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Meanwhile, GPT-5.4 mini offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a balanced model while GPT-5.4 mini is efficient. This means they're optimized for different workloads. GPT-5.4 mini targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $15.00/1M output tokens vs $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-5.4 mini has the edge here at $4.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.4 mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

GPT-5.4 mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Sonnet 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.4 mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-5.4 mini?
GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.75 per million tokens vs $3.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 — that's 75% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.4 mini?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.4 mini supports 1,050,000 tokens — a difference of 850,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.4 mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-5.4 mini is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.4 mini offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose GPT-5.4 mini for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.4 mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.50/month and GPT-5.4 mini costs about $9.00/month. Overall, GPT-5.4 mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.75 in, $4.50 out) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles