Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4 vs o1-mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
vs
OpenAI
o1-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

o1-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.0492
Per Request
$4.92
Daily
$147.60
Monthly
$1,795.80
Yearly

o1-mini costs less than Claude Opus 4

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4o1-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textreasoning
Release Date5/14/20259/12/2024

Claude Opus 4 vs o1-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4 and o1-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o1-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens93% cheaper than Claude Opus 4. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for o1-mini.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4 is a flagship model while o1-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o1-mini offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o1-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o1-mini has the edge here at $4.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4 supports vision (image inputs) while o1-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision, code)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o1-mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic)

o1-mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o1-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or o1-mini?
o1-mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.10 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4 — that's 93% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4 and o1-mini?
Claude Opus 4 supports 200,000 tokens while o1-mini supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o1-mini is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose o1-mini for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4 costs about $157.50/month and o1-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, o1-mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.10 in, $4.40 out) vs Claude Opus 4.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles