Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini: o4-mini is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($1.10/M vs $5.00/M input tokens), while o4-mini is better for long-context tasks (2,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose o4-mini for lower token spend and choose o4-mini when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini pricing • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini API pricing and opus 4 7 vs o4 mini pricing.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.7

Per Request:$0.0175
Daily:$1.75
Monthly:$52.50
Yearly:$638.75

o4-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.0142
Per Request
$1.42
Daily
$42.60
Monthly
$518.30
Yearly

o4-mini costs less than Claude Opus 4.7

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: o4-mini. At the default workload, o4-mini saves about $42.60/month ($518.30/year) versus Claude Opus 4.7.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.7o4-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$5.00/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textreasoningcode
Release Date4/16/20264/16/2025

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o4-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and o4-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o4-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens78% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7. Meanwhile, o4-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.7.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.7 is a flagship model while o4-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.7 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o4-mini offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o4-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o4-mini has the edge here at $4.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o4-mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Opus 4.7

  • Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $25.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than o4-mini
  • Higher output cost than o4-mini
  • Smaller context window than o4-mini

o4-mini

  • Input pricing: $1.10/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $4.40/M tokens
  • Context window: 2,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

o4-mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4.7 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o4-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or o4-mini?
o4-mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.10 per million tokens vs $5.00 for Claude Opus 4.7 — that's 78% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and o4-mini?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000,000 tokens while o4-mini supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,000,000 tokens in favor of o4-mini.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, o4-mini is the lower-cost option, while o4-mini offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose o4-mini for budget sensitivity or o4-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.7 costs about $52.50/month and o4-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, o4-mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.10 in, $4.40 out) vs Claude Opus 4.7.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.