Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1: Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($5.00/M vs $15.00/M input tokens), while Claude Opus 4.7 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Claude Opus 4.7 for lower token spend and choose Claude Opus 4.7 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1 • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1 pricing • Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1 API pricing and opus 4 7 vs o1 pricing.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

OpenAI

Try Anthropic →Try OpenAI →

Claude Opus 4.7 pricing page o1 pricing page Anthropic provider overview OpenAI provider overview

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.7

Per Request:$0.0175

Daily:$1.75

Monthly:$52.50

Yearly:$638.75

o1

Per Request:$0.045

Daily:$4.50

Monthly:$135.00

Yearly:$1,642.50

Cost Differences

+$0.0275

Per Request

+$2.75

Daily

+$82.50

Monthly

+$1,003.75

Yearly

o1 costs more than Claude Opus 4.7

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Claude Opus 4.7. At the default workload, Claude Opus 4.7 saves about $82.50/month ($1,003.75/year) versus o1.

Claude Opus 4.7 full pricing breakdown o1 full pricing breakdown Anthropic API pricing details OpenAI API pricing details Anthropic vs OpenAI API pricing Codex Mini vs o4-mini Deep Research Codex Mini vs o3 Deep Research

Feature Comparison

Feature	Claude Opus 4.7	o1
Provider	Anthropic	OpenAI
Input Price	$5.00/1M tokens	$15.00/1M tokens
Output Price	$25.00/1M tokens	$60.00/1M tokens
Context Window	1,000,000 tokens	200,000 tokens
Max Output	128,000 tokens	65,536 tokens
Category	flagship	reasoning
Capabilities	textvisionreasoningcode	textreasoning
Release Date	4/16/2026	9/12/2024

Claude Opus 4.7 vs o1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and o1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Opus 4.7 is the more affordable option at $5.00/1M input tokens — 67% cheaper than o1. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4.7 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for o1.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.7 is a flagship model while o1 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.7 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $60.00 for o1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge here at $25.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs) while o1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

• Budget is a primary concern
• You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
• You need more capabilities (vision, code)
• You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
• You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o1 when:

• You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Opus 4.7

• Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
• Output pricing: $25.00/M tokens
• Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
• Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

• Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

o1

• Input pricing: $15.00/M tokens
• Output pricing: $60.00/M tokens
• Context window: 200,000 tokens
• Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

• Higher input cost than Claude Opus 4.7
• Higher output cost than Claude Opus 4.7
• Smaller context window than Claude Opus 4.7

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

o1 (OpenAI)

Cost Calculator

Provider

Model

Input Tokens

Output Tokens

Requests/Day

Select a provider and model to see costs

Start using Claude Opus 4.7 today

Start using o1 today

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or o1?▼

Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper for input tokens at $5.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for o1 — that's 67% savings on input costs.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and o1?▼

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000,000 tokens while o1 supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.7.

Which model is better for AI Chatbot?▼

Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude Opus 4.7 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.7 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.7 for longer context tasks.

Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?▼

At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.7 costs about $52.50/month and o1 costs about $135.00/month. Overall, Claude Opus 4.7 has lower combined input + output rates ($5.00 in, $25.00 out) vs o1.

Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?▼

See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.