Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($0.40/M vs $5.00/M input tokens), while Claude Opus 4.7 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for lower token spend and choose Claude Opus 4.7 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 • Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 pricing • Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 API pricing and opus 4 7 vs medium 3 1 pricing.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.7

Per Request:$0.0175
Daily:$1.75
Monthly:$52.50
Yearly:$638.75

Mistral Medium 3.1

Per Request:$0.001400
Daily:$0.14
Monthly:$4.20
Yearly:$51.10

Cost Differences

$0.0161
Per Request
$1.61
Daily
$48.30
Monthly
$587.65
Yearly

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less than Claude Opus 4.7

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Mistral Medium 3.1. At the default workload, Mistral Medium 3.1 saves about $48.30/month ($587.65/year) versus Claude Opus 4.7.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.7Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Input Price$5.00/1M tokens$0.40/1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryflagshipbalanced
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textcodereasoning
Release Date4/16/20268/1/2025

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Mistral Medium 3.1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Mistral Medium 3.1 is the more affordable option at $0.40/1M input tokens92% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4.7 offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3.1.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Mistral AI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Mistral AIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.7 is a flagship model while Mistral Medium 3.1 is balanced. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.7 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while Mistral Medium 3.1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $2.00 for Mistral Medium 3.1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge here at $2.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs) while Mistral Medium 3.1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Mistral AI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Opus 4.7

  • Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $25.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Mistral Medium 3.1
  • Higher output cost than Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1

  • Input pricing: $0.40/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 131,072 tokens
  • Max output: 16,384 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Claude Opus 4.7

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral AI)

Start using Claude Opus 4.7 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Mistral Medium 3.1 today

Sign Up for Mistral AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $0.40 per million tokens vs $5.00 for Claude Opus 4.7 — that's 92% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Mistral Medium 3.1?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Mistral Medium 3.1 supports 131,072 tokens — a difference of 868,928 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Mistral Medium 3.1 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.7 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.7 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.7 costs about $52.50/month and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs about $4.20/month. Overall, Mistral Medium 3.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($0.40 in, $2.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.7.
Where can I compare Anthropic and Mistral AI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs Mistral AI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.