Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($2.00/M vs $5.00/M input tokens), while Claude Opus 4.7 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for lower token spend and choose Claude Opus 4.7 when your workload needs longer context.

Common pricing searches covered on this page: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro • Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro pricing • Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing and opus 4 7 vs 3 1 pro pricing.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
vs
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.7

Per Request:$0.0175
Daily:$1.75
Monthly:$52.50
Yearly:$638.75

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Per Request:$0.008000
Daily:$0.80
Monthly:$24.00
Yearly:$292.00

Cost Differences

$0.009500
Per Request
$0.95
Daily
$28.50
Monthly
$346.75
Yearly

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs less than Claude Opus 4.7

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Gemini 3.1 Pro. At the default workload, Gemini 3.1 Pro saves about $28.50/month ($346.75/year) versus Claude Opus 4.7.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input Price$5.00/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/1M tokens$12.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisionaudiovideocodereasoning
Release Date4/16/20262/19/2026

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option at $2.00/1M input tokens60% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Google — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Googleinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Gemini 3.1 Pro would save you roughly $2,850.00/month compared to Claude Opus 4.7. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.7 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $12.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge here at $12.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need more capabilities (audio, video)
  • • You're already using Google's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Opus 4.7

  • Input pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $25.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • Higher output cost than Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Input pricing: $2.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $12.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 65,536 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)

Start using Claude Opus 4.7 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Gemini 3.1 Pro today

Sign Up for Google

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper for input tokens at $2.00 per million tokens vs $5.00 for Claude Opus 4.7 — that's 60% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000,000 tokens while Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.7 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.7 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.7 costs about $52.50/month and Gemini 3.1 Pro costs about $24.00/month. Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro has lower combined input + output rates ($2.00 in, $12.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.7.
Where can I compare Anthropic and Google API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs Google provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.