Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.2 pro

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.5

Per Request:$0.0175
Daily:$1.75
Monthly:$52.50
Yearly:$638.75

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

Cost Differences

+$0.0875
Per Request
+$8.75
Daily
+$262.50
Monthly
+$3,193.75
Yearly

GPT-5.2 pro costs more than Claude Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5GPT-5.2 pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$5.00/1M tokens$21.00/1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/1M tokens$168.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date11/1/202512/11/2025

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.2 pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Opus 4.5 is the more affordable option at $5.00/1M input tokens76% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro. Meanwhile, GPT-5.2 pro offers a significantly larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Opus 4.5 is a flagship model while GPT-5.2 pro is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Opus 4.5 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while GPT-5.2 pro offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.5 charges $25.00/1M output tokens vs $168.00 for GPT-5.2 pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge here at $25.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic)

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.2 pro?
Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $5.00 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 76% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 pro?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 800,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.2 pro.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Claude Opus 4.5 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.2 pro offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Opus 4.5 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.2 pro for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $52.50/month and GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month. Overall, Claude Opus 4.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($5.00 in, $25.00 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles