Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4 Turbo

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Opus 4.1

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

GPT-4 Turbo

Per Request:$0.025
Daily:$2.50
Monthly:$75.00
Yearly:$912.50

Cost Differences

$0.0275
Per Request
$2.75
Daily
$82.50
Monthly
$1,003.75
Yearly

GPT-4 Turbo costs less than Claude Opus 4.1

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1GPT-4 Turbo
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$10.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$30.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output32,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisioncodereasoning
textvisioncode
Release Date8/5/20254/9/2024

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4 Turbo: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-4 Turbo depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4 Turbo is the more affordable option at $10.00/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1. Meanwhile, Claude Opus 4.1 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4 Turbo.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4 Turbo would save you roughly $8,250.00/month compared to Claude Opus 4.1. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Opus 4.1 charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $30.00 for GPT-4 Turbo. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4 Turbo has the edge here at $30.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-4 Turbo when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic)

GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Opus 4.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-4 Turbo today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4 Turbo?
GPT-4 Turbo is cheaper for input tokens at $10.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-4 Turbo?
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4 Turbo supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude Opus 4.1.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4 Turbo is the lower-cost option, while Claude Opus 4.1 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4 Turbo for budget sensitivity or Claude Opus 4.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Opus 4.1 costs about $157.50/month and GPT-4 Turbo costs about $75.00/month. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo has lower combined input + output rates ($10.00 in, $30.00 out) vs Claude Opus 4.1.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles