Skip to main content

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.2 pro

Pricing verdict: Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.2 pro: Claude Mythos 5.1 is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($10.00/M vs $21.00/M input tokens), while Claude Mythos 5.1 is better for long-context tasks (1,000,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Claude Mythos 5.1 for lower token spend and choose Claude Mythos 5.1 when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.2 pro

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Mythos 5.1

Per Request:$0.035
Daily:$3.50
Monthly:$105.00
Yearly:$1,277.50

GPT-5.2 pro

Per Request:$0.105
Daily:$10.50
Monthly:$315.00
Yearly:$3,832.50

Cost Differences

+$0.07
Per Request
+$7.00
Daily
+$210.00
Monthly
+$2,555.00
Yearly

GPT-5.2 pro costs more than Claude Mythos 5.1

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Claude Mythos 5.1. At the default workload, Claude Mythos 5.1 saves about $210.00/month ($2,555.00/year) versus GPT-5.2 pro.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Mythos 5.1GPT-5.2 pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$10.00/1M tokens$21.00/1M tokens
Output Price$50.00/1M tokens$168.00/1M tokens
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max Output128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoningcode
textvisionaudiocodereasoning
Release Date9/1/202612/11/2025

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-5.2 pro: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Mythos 5.1 and GPT-5.2 pro depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Mythos 5.1 is the more affordable option at $10.00/1M input tokens — 52% cheaper than GPT-5.2 pro.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Mythos 5.1 is a flagship model while GPT-5.2 pro is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude Mythos 5.1 is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while GPT-5.2 pro offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude Mythos 5.1 charges $50.00/1M output tokens vs $168.00 for GPT-5.2 pro. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Mythos 5.1 has the edge here at $50.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Mythos 5.1 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose GPT-5.2 pro when:

  • • You need more capabilities (audio)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Mythos 5.1

  • Input pricing: $10.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $50.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Trade-offs are minor in this matchup.

GPT-5.2 pro

  • Input pricing: $21.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $168.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens
  • Max output: 131,072 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Claude Mythos 5.1
  • Higher output cost than Claude Mythos 5.1

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Mythos 5.1 (Anthropic)

GPT-5.2 pro (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Mythos 5.1 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.2 pro today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or GPT-5.2 pro?
Claude Mythos 5.1 is cheaper for input tokens at $10.00 per million tokens vs $21.00 for GPT-5.2 pro — that's 52% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Mythos 5.1 and GPT-5.2 pro?
Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000,000 tokens while GPT-5.2 pro supports 1,000,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Mythos 5.1.
Which model is better for AI Agent / Agentic Workflows?
Both models support text, code, reasoning. For ai agent / agentic workflows, Claude Mythos 5.1 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Mythos 5.1 offers a larger context window (1,000,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Choose Claude Mythos 5.1 for budget sensitivity or Claude Mythos 5.1 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Mythos 5.1 costs about $105.00/month and GPT-5.2 pro costs about $315.00/month. Overall, Claude Mythos 5.1 has lower combined input + output rates ($10.00 in, $50.00 out) vs GPT-5.2 pro.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.