Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o4-mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
vs
OpenAI
o4-mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Per Request:$0.003500
Daily:$0.35
Monthly:$10.50
Yearly:$127.75

o4-mini

Per Request:$0.003300
Daily:$0.33
Monthly:$9.90
Yearly:$120.45

Cost Differences

$0.000200
Per Request
$0.02
Daily
$0.60
Monthly
$7.30
Yearly

o4-mini costs less than Claude Haiku 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5o4-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$1.00/1M tokens$1.10/1M tokens
Output Price$5.00/1M tokens$4.40/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens2,000,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Categoryefficientreasoning
Capabilities
textvision
textreasoningcode
Release Date10/15/20254/16/2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs o4-mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and o4-mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o4-mini is the more affordable option at $1.10/1M input tokens. Meanwhile, o4-mini offers a significantly larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude Haiku 4.5 is a efficient model while o4-mini is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. o4-mini targets more demanding workloads, while Claude Haiku 4.5 provides a cost-effective option for everyday tasks.

Output costs matter too. Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $4.40 for o4-mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o4-mini has the edge here at $4.40/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision (image inputs) while o4-mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose o4-mini when:

  • • You need a larger context window (2,000,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (reasoning, code)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 131,072 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic)

o4-mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Haiku 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o4-mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or o4-mini?
o4-mini is cheaper for input tokens at $1.10 per million tokens vs $1.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and o4-mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while o4-mini supports 2,000,000 tokens — a difference of 1,800,000 tokens in favor of o4-mini.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o4-mini is the lower-cost option, while o4-mini offers a larger context window (2,000,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o4-mini for budget sensitivity or o4-mini for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $10.50/month and o4-mini costs about $9.90/month. Overall, o4-mini has lower combined input + output rates ($1.10 in, $4.40 out) vs Claude Haiku 4.5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles