Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Pricing verdict: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: input pricing is tied at $1.00/M, Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper for output-heavy usage ($5.00/M output), and GPT-5.6 Luna is better for long-context tasks (1,050,000 tokens).

Direct answer: input pricing is tied. Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for cheaper output and choose GPT-5.6 Luna when your workload needs longer context.

Compare API pricing, input and output token costs, context windows, and monthly estimates on one page so you can pick the right model fast.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
vs
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Per Request:$0.003500
Daily:$0.35
Monthly:$10.50
Yearly:$127.75

GPT-5.6 Luna

Per Request:$0.004000
Daily:$0.40
Monthly:$12.00
Yearly:$146.00

Cost Differences

+$0.000500
Per Request
+$0.05
Daily
+$1.50
Monthly
+$18.25
Yearly

GPT-5.6 Luna costs more than Claude Haiku 4.5

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Claude Haiku 4.5. At the default workload, Claude Haiku 4.5 saves about $1.50/month ($18.25/year) versus GPT-5.6 Luna.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$1.00/1M tokens$1.00/1M tokens
Output Price$5.00/1M tokens$6.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textvisioncodereasoning
Release Date10/15/20256/26/2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Both models charge $1.00/1M input tokens, but Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output at $5.00/1M. Meanwhile, GPT-5.6 Luna offers a significantly larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens vs 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Claude Haiku 4.5 would save you roughly $150.00/month compared to GPT-5.6 Luna. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $6.00 for GPT-5.6 Luna. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when:

  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when:

  • • You need a larger context window (1,050,000 tokens)
  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 128,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude Haiku 4.5

  • Input pricing: $1.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $5.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 64,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna

  • Input pricing: $1.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $6.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 1,050,000 tokens
  • Max output: 128,000 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher output cost than Claude Haiku 4.5

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic)

GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Haiku 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-5.6 Luna today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Input pricing is tied at $1.00 per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output at $5.00 vs $6.00 for GPT-5.6 Luna, so it wins for output-heavy usage.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1,050,000 tokens — a difference of 850,000 tokens in favor of GPT-5.6 Luna.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the lower-cost option, while GPT-5.6 Luna offers a larger context window (1,050,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for budget sensitivity or GPT-5.6 Luna for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $10.50/month and GPT-5.6 Luna costs about $12.00/month. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.00 in, $5.00 out) vs GPT-5.6 Luna.
Where can I compare Anthropic and OpenAI API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs OpenAI provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.