Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
vs
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Per Request:$0.003500
Daily:$0.35
Monthly:$10.50
Yearly:$127.75

GPT-4o mini

Per Request:$0.000450
Daily:$0.045
Monthly:$1.35
Yearly:$16.425

Cost Differences

$0.003050
Per Request
$0.305
Daily
$9.15
Monthly
$111.325
Yearly

GPT-4o mini costs less than Claude Haiku 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$1.00/1M tokens$0.15/1M tokens
Output Price$5.00/1M tokens$0.60/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens16,384 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textvision
Release Date10/15/20257/18/2024

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. GPT-4o mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/1M input tokens85% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Meanwhile, Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for GPT-4o mini.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: GPT-4o mini would save you roughly $915.00/month compared to Claude Haiku 4.5. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $0.60 for GPT-4o mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. GPT-4o mini has the edge here at $0.60/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Both models support vision (image understanding), so you can send images alongside text prompts with either option.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose GPT-4o mini when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic)

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Haiku 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using GPT-4o mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-4o mini?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper for input tokens at $0.15 per million tokens vs $1.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 — that's 85% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while GPT-4o mini supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude Haiku 4.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, GPT-4o mini is the lower-cost option, while Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose GPT-4o mini for budget sensitivity or Claude Haiku 4.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $10.50/month and GPT-4o mini costs about $1.35/month. Overall, GPT-4o mini has lower combined input + output rates ($0.15 in, $0.60 out) vs Claude Haiku 4.5.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles