Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Codex Mini

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
vs
OpenAI
Codex Mini

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Per Request:$0.003500
Daily:$0.35
Monthly:$10.50
Yearly:$127.75

Codex Mini

Per Request:$0.004500
Daily:$0.45
Monthly:$13.50
Yearly:$164.25

Cost Differences

+$0.001000
Per Request
+$0.10
Daily
+$3.00
Monthly
+$36.50
Yearly

Codex Mini costs more than Claude Haiku 4.5

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5Codex Mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$1.00/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens
Output Price$5.00/1M tokens$6.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryefficientefficient
Capabilities
textvision
textcodereasoning
Release Date10/15/20252/2/2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Codex Mini: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Codex Mini depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $1.00/1M input tokens33% cheaper than Codex Mini.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the efficient category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Claude Haiku 4.5 would save you roughly $300.00/month compared to Codex Mini. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00/1M output tokens vs $6.00 for Codex Mini. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge here at $5.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision (image inputs) while Codex Mini is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 64,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Choose Codex Mini when:

  • • You need more capabilities (code, reasoning)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem
  • • You're running high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic)

Codex Mini (OpenAI)

Start using Claude Haiku 4.5 today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Codex Mini today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Codex Mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper for input tokens at $1.00 per million tokens vs $1.50 for Codex Mini — that's 33% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Codex Mini?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200,000 tokens while Codex Mini supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude Haiku 4.5.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the lower-cost option, while Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for budget sensitivity or Claude Haiku 4.5 for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $10.50/month and Codex Mini costs about $13.50/month. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 has lower combined input + output rates ($1.00 in, $5.00 out) vs Codex Mini.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles