Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs o1

Compare Anthropic and OpenAI AI models

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
OpenAI
o1

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

o1

Per Request:$0.045
Daily:$4.50
Monthly:$135.00
Yearly:$1,642.50

Cost Differences

$0.007500
Per Request
$0.75
Daily
$22.50
Monthly
$273.75
Yearly

o1 costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 Opuso1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$15.00/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$60.00/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens65,536 tokens
Categoryflagshipreasoning
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textreasoning
Release Date3/4/20249/12/2024

Claude 3 Opus vs o1: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and o1 depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. o1 is the more affordable option at $15.00/1M input tokens.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and OpenAI — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to OpenAIinvolves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

These models target different tiers: Claude 3 Opus is a flagship model while o1 is reasoning. This means they're optimized for different workloads. Claude 3 Opus is built for complex tasks that require deeper reasoning, while o1 offers better value for routine operations.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $60.00 for o1. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. o1 has the edge here at $60.00/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while o1 is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You need more capabilities (vision)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose o1 when:

  • • You need longer outputs (up to 65,536 tokens)
  • • You're already using OpenAI's API ecosystem

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

o1 (OpenAI)

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using o1 today

Sign Up for OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or o1?
o1 is cheaper for input tokens at $15.00 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and o1?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while o1 supports 200,000 tokens — a difference of 0 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, o1 is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 200,000 tokens). Choose o1 for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and o1 costs about $135.00/month. Overall, o1 has lower combined input + output rates ($15.00 in, $60.00 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles