Skip to main content

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.1 405B

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.1 405B: Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input-heavy usage ($3.50/M vs $15.00/M input tokens), while Claude 3 Opus is better for long-context tasks (200,000 tokens).

Direct answer: choose Llama 3.1 405B for lower token spend and choose Claude 3 Opus when your workload needs longer context.

Compare input and output token pricing, context windows, and monthly cost estimates on one page so you can pick the cheaper model fast.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
vs
Meta (via Together AI)
Llama 3.1 405B

Cost Comparison (1000 input + 500 output tokens, 100 requests/day)

Claude 3 Opus

Per Request:$0.0525
Daily:$5.25
Monthly:$157.50
Yearly:$1,916.25

Llama 3.1 405B

Per Request:$0.005250
Daily:$0.525
Monthly:$15.75
Yearly:$191.625

Cost Differences

$0.04725
Per Request
$4.725
Daily
$141.75
Monthly
$1,724.625
Yearly

Llama 3.1 405B costs less than Claude 3 Opus

Quick Recommendation

Winner for direct API pricing: Llama 3.1 405B. At the default workload, Llama 3.1 405B saves about $141.75/month ($1,724.625/year) versus Claude 3 Opus.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 OpusLlama 3.1 405B
ProviderAnthropicMeta (via Together AI)
Input Price$15.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Output Price$75.00/1M tokens$3.50/1M tokens
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max Output4,096 tokens32,768 tokens
Categoryflagshipflagship
Capabilities
textvisionreasoning
textcodereasoning
Release Date3/4/20247/23/2024

Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 3.1 405B: Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B depends on your priorities: cost efficiency, context length, or raw capability. Llama 3.1 405B is the more affordable option at $3.50/1M input tokens77% cheaper than Claude 3 Opus. Meanwhile, Claude 3 Opus offers a significantly larger context window at 200,000 tokens vs 128,000 for Llama 3.1 405B.

These models come from different providers — Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) — which means different API ecosystems, SDKs, rate limits, and terms of service. If you're already integrated with Anthropic, switching to Meta (via Together AI)involves migration effort beyond just pricing. Factor in your existing infrastructure when deciding.

Both models are in the flagship category, making this a direct head-to-head comparison. At scale — say 10,000 requests per day — the cost difference adds up: Llama 3.1 405B would save you roughly $14,175.00/month compared to Claude 3 Opus. For startups and indie developers, that difference can be significant.

Output costs matter too. Claude 3 Opus charges $75.00/1M output tokens vs $3.50 for Llama 3.1 405B. For generation-heavy workloads (content creation, code generation, summarization), output pricing often dominates your bill. Llama 3.1 405B has the edge here at $3.50/1M output tokens.

Multimodal capabilities: Claude 3 Opus supports vision (image inputs) while Llama 3.1 405B is text-only. If your application needs image understanding, this narrows your choice.

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude 3 Opus when:

  • • You need a larger context window (200,000 tokens)
  • • You're already using Anthropic's API ecosystem

Choose Llama 3.1 405B when:

  • • Budget is a primary concern
  • • You need longer outputs (up to 32,768 tokens)
  • • You're already using Meta (via Together AI)'s API ecosystem

Pros and Caveats at a Glance

Claude 3 Opus

  • Input pricing: $15.00/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $75.00/M tokens
  • Context window: 200,000 tokens
  • Max output: 4,096 tokens

Watch out for

  • Higher input cost than Llama 3.1 405B
  • Higher output cost than Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B

  • Input pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Output pricing: $3.50/M tokens
  • Context window: 128,000 tokens
  • Max output: 32,768 tokens

Watch out for

  • Smaller context window than Claude 3 Opus

Try Different Scenarios

Use the calculator below to see how costs change with different usage patterns

Claude 3 Opus (Anthropic)

Llama 3.1 405B (Meta (via Together AI))

Start using Claude 3 Opus today

Sign Up for Anthropic

Start using Llama 3.1 405B today

Sign Up for Meta (via Together AI)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 3.1 405B?
Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper for input tokens at $3.50 per million tokens vs $15.00 for Claude 3 Opus — that's 77% savings on input costs.
What is the context window difference between Claude 3 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B?
Claude 3 Opus supports 200,000 tokens while Llama 3.1 405B supports 128,000 tokens — a difference of 72,000 tokens in favor of Claude 3 Opus.
Which model is better for AI Chatbot?
Both models support text. For ai chatbot, Llama 3.1 405B is the lower-cost option, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window (200,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Choose Llama 3.1 405B for budget sensitivity or Claude 3 Opus for longer context tasks.
Which model has better overall pricing for heavy usage?
At 100 requests/day with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens each, Claude 3 Opus costs about $157.50/month and Llama 3.1 405B costs about $15.75/month. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B has lower combined input + output rates ($3.50 in, $3.50 out) vs Claude 3 Opus.
Where can I compare Anthropic and Meta (via Together AI) API pricing beyond this model matchup?
See the Anthropic vs Meta (via Together AI) provider comparison page for lineup-level averages, then review each model page for exact per-token rates.

Related Comparisons

Related Articles

Learn when to pick each model, then compare live pricing scenarios.